Comments on: P10 review http://semcblog.com/2008/11/30/p10-review/ Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:43:52 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: SE123 http://semcblog.com/2008/11/30/p10-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1706 SE123 Mon, 01 Dec 2008 13:27:49 +0000 http://semcblog.com/?p=3111#comment-1706 Oh please, Paris was crap thats why it was canned.  Just look at the picture of the two buttons, they don't even fit flush.  The camera cover was a joke with no kind of slide mechanism to speak off.  The battery cover just pulls off. The version you have is the final approvel version (look behind the battery - should state AP (approved protype) , so that is version that would go on sale. Now put your rose tinited glasses to one side and look forward to some more interesting full touch S60 phones in 2009. Oh please, Paris was crap thats why it was canned.  Just look at the picture of the two buttons, they don’t even fit flush.  The camera cover was a joke with no kind of slide mechanism to speak off.  The battery cover just pulls off.

The version you have is the final approvel version (look behind the battery – should state AP (approved protype) , so that is version that would go on sale.

Now put your rose tinited glasses to one side and look forward to some more interesting full touch S60 phones in 2009.

]]> By: me http://semcblog.com/2008/11/30/p10-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1703 me Sun, 30 Nov 2008 23:58:45 +0000 http://semcblog.com/?p=3111#comment-1703 in English Please !!!! what a crappy text! :dizzy: in English Please !!!!
what a crappy text! :dizzy:

]]>