<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEMC Blog Competition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://semcblog.com/2008/12/14/competition-task2-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://semcblog.com/2008/12/14/competition-task2-results/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:43:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: breccia</title>
		<link>http://semcblog.com/2008/12/14/competition-task2-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1863</link>
		<dc:creator>breccia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 17:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semcblog.com/?p=3197#comment-1863</guid>
		<description>THE new pic is PHOTOSHOPPED!!!
XD
why?
we want a re-challenge</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE new pic is PHOTOSHOPPED!!!<br />
XD<br />
why?<br />
we want a re-challenge</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominick</title>
		<link>http://semcblog.com/2008/12/14/competition-task2-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1862</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 15:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semcblog.com/?p=3197#comment-1862</guid>
		<description>In that new pic you posted, it has two round things, a cam lens and a SE logo. In the pic from the competition it has only one. So that pic is bs. IMO it&#039;s still not fair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In that new pic you posted, it has two round things, a cam lens and a SE logo. In the pic from the competition it has only one. So that pic is bs. IMO it&#8217;s still not fair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominick</title>
		<link>http://semcblog.com/2008/12/14/competition-task2-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1861</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semcblog.com/?p=3197#comment-1861</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s not fair. Even if it is really a R306 prototype, it looks more like Z770i. So that&#039;s like posting a pic that resembles K850i really much and then saing it&#039;s K770i.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s not fair. Even if it is really a R306 prototype, it looks more like Z770i. So that&#8217;s like posting a pic that resembles K850i really much and then saing it&#8217;s K770i.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maximys</title>
		<link>http://semcblog.com/2008/12/14/competition-task2-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1860</link>
		<dc:creator>Maximys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semcblog.com/?p=3197#comment-1860</guid>
		<description>&lt;span&gt;@Breccia It&#039;s R306, but prototype.
&lt;span&gt;@Diz&lt;/span&gt; Yep, fastport on the side. But in this pic hansets not connected.

Phone really looks not like R306, that why I choose this pic. &lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>@Breccia It&#8217;s R306, but prototype.<br />
<span>@Diz</span> Yep, fastport on the side. But in this pic hansets not connected.</p>
<p>Phone really looks not like R306, that why I choose this pic. </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominick</title>
		<link>http://semcblog.com/2008/12/14/competition-task2-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1859</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semcblog.com/?p=3197#comment-1859</guid>
		<description>Just what i thought. It doesn&#039;t look like any Sony Ericsson phone, but resebles Z770 more than R306. For Z770 it misses only the &quot;Z770i&quot; text. For R306 it misses the SE logo and the camera lens. Look:
http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/9449/seweirdwi2.png</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just what i thought. It doesn&#8217;t look like any Sony Ericsson phone, but resebles Z770 more than R306. For Z770 it misses only the &#8220;Z770i&#8221; text. For R306 it misses the SE logo and the camera lens. Look:<br />
<a href="http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/9449/seweirdwi2.png" rel="nofollow">http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/9449/seweirdwi2.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: breccia</title>
		<link>http://semcblog.com/2008/12/14/competition-task2-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1856</link>
		<dc:creator>breccia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 13:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semcblog.com/?p=3197#comment-1856</guid>
		<description>it can&#039;t be the r306!
look the cover battery line!
http://img237.imageshack.us/my.php?image=sonyericssonr306whitert2.jpg

it&#039;s impossible!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it can&#8217;t be the r306!<br />
look the cover battery line!<br />
<a href="http://img237.imageshack.us/my.php?image=sonyericssonr306whitert2.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img237.imageshack.us/my.php?image=sonyericssonr306whitert2.jpg</a></p>
<p>it&#8217;s impossible!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diz</title>
		<link>http://semcblog.com/2008/12/14/competition-task2-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1855</link>
		<dc:creator>Diz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 13:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semcblog.com/?p=3197#comment-1855</guid>
		<description>Max it&#039;s fairly not fair

http://static.onliner.by/img/catalog/devices/gallery/sonyericsson_r306i_30609.jpg

The SE logo on 306 has another plasement!
Futhermore, it has the FASTPORT! On the SIDE!
And on your picture the cord is going on the down-side, without fastport conector!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max it&#8217;s fairly not fair</p>
<p><a href="http://static.onliner.by/img/catalog/devices/gallery/sonyericsson_r306i_30609.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://static.onliner.by/img/catalog/devices/gallery/sonyericsson_r306i_30609.jpg</a></p>
<p>The SE logo on 306 has another plasement!<br />
Futhermore, it has the FASTPORT! On the SIDE!<br />
And on your picture the cord is going on the down-side, without fastport conector!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
