<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New nomenclature in accessories</title>
	<atom:link href="http://semcblog.com/2008/12/16/new-nomenclature-in-accessories/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://semcblog.com/2008/12/16/new-nomenclature-in-accessories/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 20:30:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: xell</title>
		<link>http://semcblog.com/2008/12/16/new-nomenclature-in-accessories/comment-page-1/#comment-1878</link>
		<dc:creator>xell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://semcblog.com/?p=3212#comment-1878</guid>
		<description>So I guess the IDP-100 photo frame would have been IM901?
(leaving out the ITC-60...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I guess the IDP-100 photo frame would have been IM901?<br />
(leaving out the ITC-60&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

